Today was an immersive dive into the public and Obras Sociales system. We talked with the Deputy Minister of Health in Buenos Aires, Daniel Ferrante, and learned about the problems within the public system. Later we also learned about Obras Sociales through Dr. Gabriel Lebersztein. Later we got to go on a tour of different areas, including the Plaza De Mayo, San Telmo, and La Boca. Dr. Lebersztein’s position as leader of the Commerce Union gave us special insight into the union system. I originally thought that unions were only for those under the employment of another business or corporation. It was interesting to learn that the unions encompass a much broader spectrum. Unions cover those under employment, self-employment, social advocates, and those in search of employment – alongside prepaid plans, they cover 72% of the population. Furthermore, unions aren’t allowed to reject anyone who comes to them for coverage. Such a heavy reliance on the union system is a stark contrast from American healthcare. Anyone can come to a union and receive basic healthcare, and only at a price of $13.80 USD. When one person is part of a union, everyone in their family can access the care of the union’s resources at a one-time additional payment. Because of Argentina’s constitutional right to healthcare, unions are compelled to provide PMO level protection to any members or associates. A dangerous loophole to the current system is that two people could lie about living together and being in a relationship, and the partner to the member would have to be given aid. Additionally, people can ask for any medication or procedure and the union would be forced to comply. In essence, the unions are completely at the hands of the people. This safety net has actually served as a detriment to the Argentinian people. They pay for guaranteed quality service; and as a result people feel that they have to use it. The people become reactionary to their issues instead of preventative. Unlike the public system, the unions assume full financial responsibility for their medical services. As such, they are at risk of crumbling under the service of the public.