Seeing Othello’s castle in Famagusta reminded me of a famous Shakespearean quip, “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose, by any other word would smell as sweet”. Even if this may be possible in a perfect world, this is nothing more than a romantic ideal. This claim is especially true when referencing the ever-present discussion/argument of the Ottomans converting churches to mosques. Saying this issue is multifaceted would be an understatement because there are an enumerator number of elements of politics, religion, history, and culture at play. 

If the goal is to preserve the Island’s historical development, the conversion of the St. Nicholas Cathedral to the Lala Mustafa Pasha mosque could be acceptable if the original builders are acknowledged for their work. This is because, even as a mosque, the integrity of the architecture remains intact. While the inside may resemble a mosque, the stained glass windows and gothic design are characteristic of  Christianity. By combining both elements, the building is able to preserve history while reflecting the needs of the current demographic in the North.  

Comparatively, constructing a mosque on top of the church of St. Basilicas is a more complicated scenario because it stands to erase/hide a critical aspect of Cypriot history. Therefore it is warranted for archaeologists to escalate the church from under the mosque. This is only reinforced by the fact that the majority of the population in the South is part of some Christian denomination. 

To clarify and refine my thoughts on the subject, I would have loved to have more time to talk to the locals or have the tour given by the Turkish guide. 

With that being said, the thing cleansing of the Greek Cypriots in the North is cruel and unacceptable no matter what. The dystopic state of Varosha is evidence of this prejudice. Beyond that, it is heartbreaking to see the loss of such an incredible, vibrant city to the Civil War because it set back the socio-economic development and growth of Cyprus by months and stripped Cypriots of their heritage. 

In the end, while others may disagree, it is not the name or purpose of the building that is problematic, but rather the blatant erasure of history and potential disregard for the locals’ freedom of religion.